Get started

Original research · Updated August 6, 2026

OnlyFans Statistics 2026

29,129 creator profiles measured directly: pricing, services, categories, bios, media, geography, dormancy, and what separates the most-Googled creators on the platform from everyone else. Original data with full methodology.

Executive summary: the 12 findings that matter

  1. Median engagement is highest in the $10–14.99 band and lower on either side of it. Creators charging over $30 record lower engagement than creators charging nothing.
  2. Free subscriptions have become substantially more common among recent cohorts. The median creator who started in 2024 or later charges nothing; 75.8% of the 2026 cohort is free.
  3. Higher video share is associated with lower median engagement at every band measured. Creators with under 5% video record 12.45 likes per day; those over 50% record 5.05.
  4. Library size shows the largest unadjusted engagement spread among the variables examined, a 16.7× spread from the smallest libraries to the largest.
  5. The most-Googled creators are not better at OnlyFans. 29.7× the engagement, but the same price, the same tenure, fewer videos and fewer advertised services.
  6. Those same creators write like law firms. legal, copyright, terms and team are the words that most separate their bios from everyone else's.
  7. Creators advertising interactive services record the highest median engagement of the groups observed. Video calls +83%, phone sex +80%, sexting +60%.
  8. Bio length is associated with a 3.7× engagement gap, and it survives when tested inside each start-year cohort.
  9. We found almost no unadjusted difference in median engagement between profiles with and without visible social links (8.35 against 8.48 likes per day), contradicting standard cross-promotion advice.
  10. Free trials show almost no unadjusted difference either (8.35 against 8.58).
  11. 29.8% of creators have not been active in 30 days, and 14.3% have been silent for 90 days or more.
  12. 19.2% of bios carry a copyright or DMCA warning, a measure of content theft taken from creators' own words.

All figures are measured from a sample of 29,129 public OnlyFans creator profiles in the Fanswiper index. OnlyFans publishes no creator directory, so this is a sample and not a census of the platform. Every section below repeats its own sample size.

Data quality at a glance

PopulationProfilesNote
Indexed and live29,239All non-removed profiles in the index
Primary analytical sample29,129Carry both a like count and a first-post date
Engagement sample29,117The above, with more than 30 days of tenure
Readable bios28,45997.7% of the analytical sample
Known location16,34356.1%, self-reported and unverified
Activity timestamp23,09379.3%
Search-volume subset119Creators with measurable Google search demand
Report generatedAugust 6, 2026Recomputed from the live index

The two sample sizes differ by 12 creators whose accounts are under 30 days old. Engagement rates exclude them because a lifetime-normalised rate over a few weeks is dominated by the launch period. Descriptive counts use the larger sample; every table states which applies.

How engagement is measured

Normalized likes per day = cumulative profile likes divided by days since the creator's first recorded post. It is a lifetime-normalised proxy, not a count of likes received on a typical current day. Raw like counts are cumulative, so comparing them between creators mostly measures who has been on the platform longest, which is why this normalisation is applied everywhere.

It is not a measure of revenue, subscribers, conversion or content quality, and it is not described as any of those anywhere in this report. Likes on pay-per-view content are not visible to us at all.

All comparisons in this report are unadjusted descriptive comparisons of group medians. No multivariable model has been fitted. Differences may reflect tenure, posting behaviour, off-platform fame, cohort composition or other unobserved factors.

1OnlyFans creator statistics: the headline numbers

Every figure on this page is measured directly from 29,129 public OnlyFans creator profiles in the Fanswiper index. None of it is collected from other publishers.

29,117
Creator profiles analysed
28,442
Bios read
250
Distinct tags in the vocabulary
$9.99
Median subscription price
30.0%
Free to subscribe
381
Median photos per creator
90
Median videos per creator
332
Median posts per creator
13,729
Median likes per creator
98.5%
Verified creators
68.9%
Offering a free trial
44.1%
Publishing any social link
10.1
Longest tenure (years)
5.3
Median tenure (years)

2OnlyFans Google search statistics

We hold monthly Google search volume for 119 creators, together accounting for 1,714,600 searches a month. Comparing them against the other 28,998 answers a question nobody else has the data to ask: what does the world's demand actually attach to?

Most-searched

248.39
normalized likes per day

Everyone else

8.35
normalized likes per day
The profile variables measured here explain little of the engagement gap between the most-searched creators and the rest of the sample.

They record 29.7× the daily engagement of everyone else, yet price the same, have the same tenure, publish fewer videos, use fewer emoji, offer fewer services and are less likely to publish a social link. Almost nothing they do on the platform explains the gap.

Profile attributes compared

AttributeMost-searchedEveryone else
Likes per day of tenure248.398.35
Total likes443,48413,624
Subscription price (USD)$10.00$9.99
Posts596332
Photos658380
Videos4990
Cleaned bio length592300
Emoji in bio23
Tenure (days)1,8831,946
Has social links (%)37.8%44.1%
Free to subscribe (%)31.9%30.0%

Medians. Most-searched n=119, everyone else n=28,998.

Behaviour compared

BehaviourMost-searchedEveryone else
Posts per day of tenure0.400.20
Video share of library (%)8.9%17.0%
Dormant over 30 days (%)10.9%29.9%
Offering a free trial (%)62.2%68.9%
Verified (%)96.6%98.5%
Publishing a social link (%)37.8%44.1%
Why it matters

Every "how to grow on OnlyFans" guide implicitly assumes that on-platform behaviour drives demand. In this sample the creators with the most demand are distinguished by almost nothing they do on the platform. Their advantage arrives from outside it.

Competing explanations

Off-platform fame is the obvious reading, and the leaderboard supports it: several of these names are known from other platforms entirely. The alternative, that they are simply better operators, is not supported, because they post more but price the same, publish fewer videos and offer fewer services.

For creators

Growth strategy copied from the most-searched creators will not transfer. What made them searchable happened elsewhere. The transferable parts are posting rate and staying active.

For agencies

Signing for reach means signing for existing off-platform demand. Nothing in these profiles suggests on-platform optimisation produces this tier.

For marketers

Search volume is the cleanest available proxy for a creator's reach, and it is nearly independent of her platform metrics. Do not infer one from the other.

The language gap: how the most-searched write

This is the clearest difference in the entire dataset, and it is not about sex.

The vocabulary separating the most-searched bios is legal, not sexual.

The words that separate their bios from everyone else's are onlyfans, legal, any, copyright, account, terms. Not one is about content. These are boilerplate copyright and terms notices, the signature of a creator with management and a legal template. The word team appears in 28.6% of their bios against 1.2% of everyone else's.

WordMost-searchedEveryone elseGap
onlyfans52.1%17.2%+34.9pp
legal49.6%14.7%+34.9pp
any52.1%18.9%+33.2pp
copyright42.0%11.6%+30.4pp
account37.8%7.7%+30.2pp
terms35.3%5.9%+29.4pp
action42.9%13.6%+29.2pp
protected31.9%3.0%+28.9pp
including37.0%8.2%+28.8pp
result39.5%11.3%+28.2pp
international29.4%1.5%+27.9pp
prohibited29.4%1.7%+27.7pp
team28.6%1.2%+27.4pp
owned35.3%8.4%+26.9pp
strictly28.6%1.8%+26.7pp
creator30.3%3.7%+26.6pp
acknowledge26.9%1.0%+25.9pp
disclaimer32.8%6.9%+25.9pp

Share of bios containing the word. Sorted by percentage-point gap. Click any header to re-sort.

Services compared

The counter-intuitive one: the most-searched creators advertise fewer services than everyone else, across every category we detect. Demand this large does not need to be converted with add-ons.

Service advertisedMost-searchedEveryone else
customs6.7%17.7%
sexting7.6%8.6%
video call1.7%4.8%
gfe1.7%3.0%
dick rating5.9%6.8%
phone sex0.0%0.7%

Where they are

CountryCreatorsShare of most-searched
US2722.7%
GB32.5%
CA21.7%
MX10.8%
AU10.8%
BR10.8%

Self-reported location, known for a subset.

Emoji compared

😈15.1%
❤12.6%
😉10.1%
👀9.2%
💕9.2%
💋9.2%
✨9.2%
💦9.2%
🤭7.6%
🍑6.7%
🍆6.7%
💖5.9%

Most-searched creators. Compare with the platform-wide list in the emoji section below.

The 50 most-Googled OnlyFans creators

#CreatorMonthly searchesTotal likesPricePostsPhotosVideos
1. Piper Rockelle @piperrockelle122,000131,123$20.0011614710
2. Bhad Bhabie @bhadbhabie49,0001,919,025$23.9953627134
3. Kirsten 🍭 @kirstentoosweet39,000581,617$7.9953548218
4. LIL TAY @liltay37,000178,878$19.9917820311
5. Jerbear❤️‍🔥 @berigalaxy33,000303,511$15.0026028456
6. Carly🐻 @itscarlyjane29,0001,612,746$11.0031934446
7. Iggy Azalea @iggyazalea27,0000Free000
8. Alina Rose @alina_rose26,00010,537Free16610
9. Aishah Sofey @kawaiisofey26,000412,419$8.993914558
10. Angela Alvarez @angelaalvarez23,000177,929$10.0012614412
11. ashhhhh:)) @ashleyyyreyyy22,0001,481,759Free2,6112,891596
12. Lexi Marvel @leximarvel21,000432,252$8.9962568215
13. Danielle Uncensored @danicooppss21,000443,484$9.9926516971
14. pinkchyu @pinkchyuwu20,000151,278Free17426487
15. Noelle Leyva @noelleleyva20,000325,086Free1,4171,74173
16. May😽 @mayseeds20,000845,869$19.992,9353,948144
17. Paige VanZant @paigevanzantoftv18,000461,003Free1101222
18. Corinna Kopf @corinnakopf18,0002,757,858$19.993393168
19. The Allie Rae ® Official Onlyfans Page @theallierae17,000385,082$12.002,5951,752648
20. Denise Richards @deniserichards17,000747,231$25.001,1981,04354
21. 💋Marleny1 @marleny117,0005,944,228$29.9989681382
22. Marie Temara @marietemara16,0001,499,143$16.992,2732,32665
23. miss natalie nunn @natalienunn16,00037,456Free32811340
24. Victoria ♡ @queenpussybossv16,000590,429$15.001,4151,38242
25. Nathalie 🤍 @natty_love2716,000264,636$14.9951962358
26. Camilla Araujo @camillaxaraujo16,000120,714$10.0013518416
27. alice rosenblum @alicerosenblum15,000121,214$50.0050547131
28. aiko kim @lacykim15,00086,032$14.9926357
29. Taliyaandgustavo @taliyaandgustavo15,0002,066,113Free1,6503,3851,909
30. Leyla Ingalls @leylaingallz15,00080,702Free13724977
31. Sky Bri @skybri15,0002,608,256$20.001,7271,471548
32. Mandy_Rose @mandy_rosefree15,00068,127Free32971817
33. DREA DE MATTEO @dreadematteo15,000201,752$15.0073165815
34. DREA DE MATTEO @ofdreadematteo15,00021,737Free7661,061368
35. GRACIEBON @graciebon114,0001,293,215$9.99638501122
36. Sophie Rain @sophieraiin14,0001,195,340$10.0036347841
37. Patricia (VIP) 🍑 @sendnudesx14,000609,847$13.991,6281,94553
38. Ana your new crush @anattraction14,00052,135$18.00576410221
39. G baby @brattygbaby14,000167,503$9.9957153625
40. Kayla 🍓 @butternutgiraffe14,000628,268$15.002,1024,054577
41. Skylarmaexo RATED #1 PAGE ON ONLYFANS 🏆 @skylarmaexo14,0006,483,712$30.003,9844,088565
42. Mary Burke @maryburke14,000324,027Free3,10220,3524,657
43. Misscarriejune @misscarriejune14,0002,984,651Free9,5749,3872,605
44. Katiana Kay @katianakayfree14,000857,532Free11710721
45. Unashamed @unashamed14,000297,039$9.991,698824895
46. Ambs 🍒 @ambsofficialxo13,0001,974,934$30.001,8031,73170
47. Ava Addams @avaaddams13,0002,685,190$8.00453816
48. Eva Lovia Free @evalovia13,0001,337,733Free3,8233,767101
49. Carmen @latina13,00018,929$4.991,2341,20332
50. Baylee Adami @bayleeadami13,00024,404$15.0069770

Estimated monthly Google searches for the creator's NAME, not for an individual profile. 1 name in this set maps to more than one profile (an official page and a mirror), so both rows carry the same figure and the handle is shown to tell them apart. The headline total above is deduplicated by name. Click any header to re-sort. Download CSV

Read this carefully. Search volume measures public curiosity, not earnings, quality or subscriber count. Several of these creators are known primarily from other platforms, which is precisely the finding. Note also that our classifier has enriched these profiles more heavily than average, so descriptive tag counts for this group are inflated by our own pipeline and are excluded from the comparison above.

3OnlyFans service statistics: what creators advertise

Our classifier reads each bio and records the services a creator advertises. Note the wording: this measures what creators say they offer, not what they deliver. Baseline engagement across the whole sample is 8.43 likes per day.

Creators advertising interactive services record the highest median engagement of the service groups observed.

Creators advertising video call record 15.41 likes per day, +83% against baseline. Live and one-to-one services occupy the top of this table; passive content sits at the bottom.

video call +83% phone sex +80% sexting +60% gfe +19% dick rating +19% customs +12%
Service advertisedCreatorsShareNormalized likes/dayvs baselineMedian price
video call1,4064.8%15.41+83%$9.99
phone sex1940.7%15.14+80%$9.99
sexting2,4958.6%13.50+60%$8.00
gfe8803.0%10.05+19%$9.99
dick rating1,9846.8%10.02+19%$9.69
customs5,13217.6%9.48+12%$9.99

Baseline 8.43 likes/day. Services with at least 100 creators.

4OnlyFans category statistics: engagement by content type

30 content categories with at least 200 creators, ranked by median engagement rather than by popularity. The two orderings are very different.

CategoryCreatorsShareNormalized likes/dayvs baselineMedian price
threesome4501.5%20.26+140%$10.00
facial2000.7%20.25+140%$10.00
blowjob9163.1%17.19+104%$9.99
joi1,2094.2%16.87+100%$9.99
anal1,5825.4%16.48+96%$9.99
squirt1,0293.5%16.12+91%$9.99
creampie3371.2%15.04+78%$10.00
hardcore2130.7%13.31+58%$9.99
roleplay8092.8%13.26+57%$9.88
blonde7292.5%13.15+56%$9.50
fitness1,1283.9%13.05+55%$9.95
solo4,13514.2%12.53+49%$9.99
latex4131.4%12.52+49%$9.99
pegging5792.0%12.48+48%$7.99
arab4801.6%11.86+41%$9.99
bbc2680.9%10.73+27%$9.99
outdoors5952.0%10.14+20%$9.99
petite9923.4%9.81+16%$9.00
teacher3161.1%9.73+15%$6.47
asian1,2434.3%9.63+14%$9.99
amateur1,0043.4%9.54+13%$9.99
anime1,1283.9%8.60+2%$8.99
cosplay1,8236.3%8.420%$9.99
cuckold7402.5%7.79-8%$8.00
milf2,5648.8%6.98-17%$7.00
latina1,5445.3%6.93-18%$9.99
couple7202.5%6.82-19%$8.00
hentai2000.7%6.58-22%$9.99
feet1,7165.9%6.56-22%$9.98
ebony3641.3%6.19-27%$9.00

Ranked by median normalized likes per day. Baseline 8.43.

5OnlyFans creator attribute statistics

Physical and stylistic attributes our classifier detects in bios, ranked by engagement. These describe how creators describe themselves.

AttributeCreatorsShareNormalized likes/dayvs baseline
gym6732.3%18.32+117%
cute1,8516.4%11.25+33%
natural2,2627.8%9.50+13%
latex3851.3%7.21-14%
blonde1,1323.9%6.96-17%
latina4741.6%5.99-29%
brunette7862.7%5.72-32%
glam1,9796.8%5.46-35%
tattoos1,1043.8%4.55-46%
asian5351.8%4.12-51%
piercings8993.1%3.73-56%
redhead1,1453.9%3.70-56%
curvy4941.7%3.24-62%
goth4731.6%2.91-65%
athletic4961.7%2.82-67%
mature7152.5%2.58-69%
ebony4951.7%2.10-75%
cosplay4761.6%1.96-77%
slim5081.7%1.90-77%

Attributes with at least 150 creators.

6OnlyFans pricing statistics

Subscription price is known for every creator in the sample. The relationship with engagement is not the one most pricing advice assumes.

Median engagement is highest in the $10–14.99 band, and lower above it.

9.63 likes per day in that band against 6.35 above $30, which is below what free creators achieve. The pattern is an interior maximum rather than a straight line in either direction.

Why it matters

Pricing advice on OnlyFans is almost universally directional: charge more to signal quality, or charge less to build volume. This sample of 29,117 creators supports neither. The curve has an interior maximum, which means both pieces of advice are wrong past a point.

Competing explanations

Three readings fit. Higher prices may suppress the subscriber base faster than they raise commitment. Creators who already have an engaged audience may gravitate to the middle band. Or the expensive tier may contain a disproportionate share of creators testing a price they cannot sustain. Cross-sectional data cannot separate these.

For creators

If you are above $20, the data gives no support for the premium. Test downward toward the $10–14.99 band and measure your own result rather than trusting this median.

For agencies

Price positioning above $20 needs a specific justification for that creator. Portfolio-wide, the middle band is where engagement concentrates.

For marketers

Do not use headline subscription price as a proxy for audience quality. It is close to uncorrelated with engagement across the sample.

Free 8.33 $0.01–4.99 5.65 $5–9.99 7.97 $10–14.99 9.63 $15–19.99 9.39 $20–29.99 7.39 $30+ 6.35
Price bandCreatorsNormalized likes/dayPosts/dayMedian postsVideo share
Free8,7288.330.1519814.5%
$0.01–4.991,0275.650.1830515.7%
$5–9.997,0127.970.2340217.7%
$10–14.996,1949.630.2443517.8%
$15–19.992,9739.390.2442618.6%
$20–29.992,1287.390.2036020.5%
$30+1,0556.350.1831620.8%

The most common price points

PriceCreatorsShare of all creators
Free8,72830.0%
$10.002,4698.5%
$9.992,3978.2%
$15.001,5615.4%
$20.001,0383.6%
$4.991,0273.5%
$5.008783.0%
$14.998322.9%
$12.006922.4%
$12.995822.0%
$25.005621.9%
$19.995191.8%
$7.994741.6%
$8.004361.5%

Exact advertised monthly price.

What this does not prove. These are associations measured at one point in time. We cannot say a creator who changes her price will see engagement move. It is equally consistent with creators who already have an engaged audience choosing that band.

7OnlyFans free vs paid statistics

Because every creator carries the date of her first post, the sample splits into cohorts by the year someone started. That reveals the largest structural change in the data.

The median creator who started in 2024 or later charges nothing to subscribe.

Median price falls from $9.99 for the 2016 cohort to Free for 2026. Free-to-subscribe has gone from a minority tactic to the default opening position, with revenue moved to pay-per-view and tips.

2016 18.1% 2017 12.1% 2018 14.2% 2019 13.8% 2020 24.6% 2021 28.2% 2022 32.3% 2023 40.1% 2024 50.9% 2025 57.0% 2026 75.8%

Share of each start-year cohort that is free to subscribe.

StartedCreatorsMedian price% freeMedian postsVideo shareBio length% with links
201694$9.9918.1%1,97515.5%38658.5%
2017642$9.9912.1%1,02819.7%29465.4%
2018838$10.0014.2%77522.5%26155.6%
20192,952$10.0013.8%61819.4%26755.5%
20208,276$9.9924.6%38917.7%25650.2%
20214,940$9.9928.2%33116.5%30541.5%
20224,390$8.9932.3%28816.3%34439.9%
20233,676$6.9940.1%22615.4%35135.1%
20242,276Free50.9%19215.1%34531.0%
2025818Free57.0%14212.2%31631.7%
2026215Free75.8%769.5%26220.0%
Survivorship. We see only creators whose profiles exist today, so early cohorts are samples of survivors. The price finding is robust to this because the bias runs the other way: survivors would be expected to price higher, and they do.

8OnlyFans bio statistics

85.9% of bios contain raw HTML, because OnlyFans supplies a rich-text editor. Measuring the field directly measures markup. Every figure here uses text with markup and URLs stripped.

Creators with bios over 1,000 characters record 3.7× the daily engagement of those with under 100.

4.99 against 18.29 likes per day, monotonic across every band above 100 characters.

Empty 7.17 1–99 4.99 100–249 6.26 250–499 10.23 500–999 11.96 1,000+ 18.29
Cleaned bio lengthCreatorsNormalized likes/day
Empty6757.17
1–995,6184.99
100–2496,5286.26
250–4997,17810.23
500–9998,76911.96
1,000+34918.29

Is that just tenure in disguise?

Established creators write more and have had longer to accumulate likes. So we ran the same comparison inside each start-year cohort, holding the year constant.

CohortShort bio (<250)Long bio (≥500)Ratio
20165.0338.317.6×
20179.0829.313.2×
20189.5415.421.6×
20196.5817.292.6×
20204.1912.212.9×
20215.1411.382.2×
20226.4810.821.7×
20236.4610.551.6×
20247.2411.681.6×
202516.7211.790.7×
202613.3811.430.9×

The gap survives in every cohort with enough data, so it is not an artefact of age.

9OnlyFans emoji statistics

Emoji use is near-universal and measurably associated with engagement.

Emoji in bioCreatorsNormalized likes/day
None6,4604.66
1–38,5128.47
4–98,47711.06
10+5,66811.59

The 20 most common emoji in OnlyFans bios

😈20.2%
🔥16.3%
💦14.5%
💋12.3%
❤11.4%
✨11.0%
😘8.7%
🍑7.2%
💕7.1%
😉6.8%
🍆6.5%
🥰6.3%
🖤6.1%
😏5.9%
🥵5.7%
🔞4.7%
🏻4.7%
💌4.0%
💖3.9%
🎥3.8%

Share of bios containing each emoji at least once.

10OnlyFans bio language statistics

Across 28,459 bios, the vocabulary is more commercial and more defensive than the platform's public image suggests.

WordShare of bios
content42.9%
videos28.4%
page23.9%
any19.0%
love18.1%
onlyfans17.3%
custom17.3%
girl15.3%
legal14.8%
free14.7%
i'm14.6%
video14.5%
welcome14.4%
see14.3%
solo14.0%
action13.8%
exclusive13.1%
only12.8%
play12.8%
copyright11.7%
result11.4%
like11.1%
full11.0%
fun10.9%

Share of bios containing the word at least once. Stop words removed.

19.2% of creator bios contain a copyright warning or DMCA notice.

Roughly one bio in five spends space that could sell the page threatening legal action over content theft instead. That is a measure of how widespread leaking is, taken from creators' own words rather than from anti-piracy vendors with something to sell.

Bio containsShare of bios
Offers custom content24.4%
Copyright or DMCA warning19.2%
Mentions “free”14.6%
Asks you to subscribe12.9%
Offers sexting10.7%
Promises daily posts10.7%
Mentions PPV7.7%
Invites a DM7.2%
Mentions tips7.1%
Advertises “no PPV”3.5%

11OnlyFans photo and video statistics

Media counts are known for every creator. OnlyFans is far more photo-led than its reputation suggests, and the creators who lean hardest into video do not benefit.

Video share of libraryCreatorsShareNormalized likes/day
Under 5% video4,32314.8%12.45
5–15%8,76130.1%10.27
15–30%7,94027.3%8.12
30–50%4,83716.6%6.65
Over 50%3,05210.5%5.05

Videos as a percentage of photos plus videos.

Why it matters

Video is the more expensive format to produce by a wide margin, and the sample shows it is associated with lower engagement at every band. That inverts the standard production advice.

Competing explanations

Photographs are cheaper, so a photo-led creator can post far more often, and volume is the strongest predictor in this dataset. Video may also sit behind pay-per-view more often, where likes are not recorded. The measure here is likes, which favours what is visible in-feed.

For creators

Before commissioning more video, check whether the same budget buys more photo sets. Nothing here suggests video earns its cost in engagement.

For agencies

Production budgets weighted toward video should be justified per creator, not applied as a house standard.

For marketers

Video share is a poor proxy for production quality or audience size. Library size is a much better one.

Library size

Total media itemsCreatorsShareNormalized likes/day
Under 1003,66012.6%2.66
100–49910,70236.8%4.58
500–1,4998,49529.2%11.40
1,500–4,9994,89016.8%22.05
5,000+1,3704.7%44.25

12OnlyFans tag statistics

Our classifier applies a vocabulary of 250 tags. How many a creator attracts is itself a signal of how much she has written.

Tags appliedCreatorsShareNormalized likes/day
0–12,6169.0%12.60
2–311,83640.6%8.45
4–57,01324.1%6.86
6–96,67222.9%8.52
10–149193.2%12.20

Bands under 200 creators are omitted: the largest tag counts are dominated by a handful of very large accounts and the median there describes nobody.

These tags are ours, not the creators'. They are derived from bio text, so tag count is partly a measure of how much a creator wrote. Read this table as a property of our classification, not of creator behaviour.

13The Fanswiper Profile Completeness Score

A six-point index built only from things a creator controls: a bio of 250+ characters, at least one emoji, four or more detected tags, 500+ media items, 300+ posts, and activity within the past 30 days. One point each.

Engagement rises monotonically with every point scored: 2.72 at zero, 26.90 at six.

A 9.9× spread across a scale made entirely of choices, with no reference to fame, tenure or price.

Score 0 2.72 Score 1 2.78 Score 2 3.82 Score 3 5.75 Score 4 11.58 Score 5 18.20 Score 6 26.90
ScoreCreatorsShareNormalized likes/day
08953.1%2.72
12,8559.8%2.78
24,94817.0%3.82
36,27721.6%5.75
45,66119.4%11.58
55,06417.4%18.20
63,41711.7%26.90

14Variables showing little or no unadjusted difference

Negative results are worth publishing. These two contradict standard creator advice.

Almost no unadjusted difference in median engagement between profiles with and without social links.

8.35 likes per day with at least one external link (n=12,833) against 8.48 with none (n=16,284).

Almost no unadjusted difference between profiles with and without a free trial, either.

8.35 likes per day with a trial (n=20,048) against 8.58 without (n=9,069).

15OnlyFans top creator statistics: the top 10% versus everyone else

Ranking every creator by normalized likes per day and splitting at the ninetieth percentile gives 2,911 creators against 26,206.

AttributeTop 10%Everyone else
Cleaned bio length (characters)426287
Emoji in bio53
Subscription price (USD/month)910
Total posts1,087298
Photos1,176337
Videos16785
Video share of media (%)11.9%18.2%
Tenure (days since first post)1,9991,940
Has social links (%)44.4%44.0%
Free to subscribe (%)37.5%29.1%

Medians. Tenure is included to show the two groups are not separated by age.

16OnlyFans activity and dormancy statistics

Measured from the platform's own last-activity timestamp, available for 23,093 creators.

29.8% of creators have not been active in the past 30 days, and 14.3% have been silent for 90 days or more.

Median time since last activity is 17 days, with a long tail: the ninetieth percentile sits at 160 days.

Inactive for more thanShare of creators
7 days98.2%
30 days29.8%
90 days14.3%
180 days9.2%
365 days5.2%

n=23,081.

17OnlyFans geography statistics

Location is self-reported and known for 16,343 creators (56.1% of the sample). It is not verified.

CountryCreatorsMedian priceNormalized likes/day% free
MX487$10.0011.9114.2%
ES332$9.9911.1621.7%
AU691$10.0010.0920.5%
CA875$9.999.0925.1%
AR188Free9.0155.9%
BR610$10.008.2614.6%
US7,439$9.998.1728.8%
FR195$9.997.3327.2%
GB1,510$9.997.1522.3%
CO979$10.003.6413.5%
IT430$9.003.5330.9%
DE846$8.932.2831.9%

Countries with at least 120 creators, ordered by median engagement.

US states

StateCreatorsMedian priceNormalized likes/day% free
CA901$9.9512.0429.9%
FL749$9.9916.7431.5%
TX532$9.9912.0027.6%
NY376$9.9911.0722.3%
NV303$7.5015.5830.0%
GA213$10.0016.6326.8%
WA212$9.998.5825.9%
AZ190$9.999.4023.7%
PA188$9.996.2622.3%
IL188$9.9912.1526.1%
MI148$9.996.7125.7%
TN146$10.007.1423.3%
OR145$9.996.8626.2%
CO140$9.997.5437.9%
OH135$9.994.6730.4%
MO133$9.997.3230.1%
MD130$9.992.2619.2%
WI118$7.252.5535.6%
NC104$9.996.6030.8%
LA102$10.003.1922.5%

States with at least 60 creators, ordered by creator count.

18OnlyFans creator leaderboards

Every table on this page is sortable. Click a column header to re-rank it.

Top 50 creators by total likes

CreatorTotal likesNormalized likes/dayPricePostsMedia
Bryce Adams 💪🍑13,108,3606457.81$6.991,6852,439
lilianaheartsss10,378,3453888.70Free106106
PeachJars9,782,7833421.93Free2,6274,614
🌺Ginny Potter🌺9,569,7233685.13Free2,9905,633
Jessica Nigri6,688,8372786.03Free1,2523,566
Skylarmaexo RATED #1 PAGE ON ONLYFANS 🏆6,483,7122989.47$30.003,9844,653
Mrs. Poindexter6,222,7592473.42$14.9916,35828,637
Peyton 💗 (#1 NAUGHTY FITNESS ⭐ ON OF)6,054,9502821.71$25.006,06810,405
𝐿𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑒 𝑀𝒶𝓎 💋 Average Mom Next door 🚪6,009,5682236.66$11.9912,45213,921
💋Marleny15,944,2282625.72$29.99896895
SuicideGirls4,984,6201901.91$4.9910,46573,447
Hannah Brooks4,915,4721371.56$12.9915,89415,935
Big Titty Goth Egg 😈 AKA Lee4,689,3562037.21$9.991,6884,782
Dainty Wilder4,197,0341831.29$9.996,1486,762
Giuliana4,068,4691651.94Free4,3754,486
Cheerleader Kait3,988,9541818.25$9.993,5945,438
Mia Malkova🤍🤍3,834,0421115.57$9.991,2521,614
Brynn Woods3,791,6411762.04Free1,5666,017
ZartPrickelnd3,642,2111606.02$9.992,2202,340
Taylor’s diary3,523,5181439.44Free2,8213,487
Alyssa 💞✨3,443,2091554.60Free1,3591,156
Caireen3,373,3031292.03Free15,67217,425
Imogen Lucie3,372,6031423.73$29.9917,78821,732
Emily Hill VIP3,357,8531438.76$12.995,47919,647
ANGELA WHITE3,266,5721002.68$9.992,9345,903
Tati Evans ✨3,192,5101398.48$4.992,1703,024
ginasavagex3,134,5631551.11$20.00223229
Misscarriejune2,984,6512317.55Free9,57411,992
Redheadwinter FREE!2,954,9721294.42Free3,6415,472
Violet Myers2,848,3951061.71$9.993,0054,256
Tayler hills2,836,1621814.74$5.002,8412,863
Nita Marie XXX2,781,3181050.01Free20,80323,695
Corinna Kopf2,757,8581463.17$19.99339324
Shaye ❤️big titty redhead❤️2,725,4341054.39Free28,83717,816
Nakedbakers2,696,8571122.36Free4,3054,325
Ava Addams2,685,190779.03$8.004554
Adriana Chechik2,670,964775.80$4.993,6273,779
Rebecca Goodwin2,667,632999.54$12.507,0797,109
Sky Bri2,608,2561062.06$20.001,7272,019
Lexi2Legit 💞2,589,0001233.53$20.00219226
💋 Sara Underwood2,585,1511116.29Free1,4062,299
👙 Brooke is 𝗖𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗠𝗬 🥛2,579,8271092.29Free28,66128,447
DANI DANIELS2,527,384732.61$9.9911,80317,702
Dakotah Blue 💙2,488,0601090.85Free1,1211,153
Maitland Ward2,433,181953.50$15.991,006997
H0rny Gamer GF Experience🎮💦2,423,299887.38Free1,2191,258
Paige VanZant2,332,5661643.99$29.991,6132,370
Ellie 👱🏼‍♀️2,311,904966.17Free19,10823,965
Brittanya💸2,299,056977.14$20.00410427
Sar ☘️ Irish accent 🥵 DM “GIFT” NOW!🎁💦2,191,419974.90Free53,83552,604

Top 25 by engagement rate

CreatorNormalized likes/dayTotal likesPriceMedia
Bryce Adams 💪🍑6457.8113,108,360$6.992,439
lilianaheartsss3888.7010,378,345Free106
🌺Ginny Potter🌺3685.139,569,723Free5,633
PeachJars3421.939,782,783Free4,614
Skylarmaexo RATED #1 PAGE ON ONLYFANS 🏆2989.476,483,712$30.004,653
Peyton 💗 (#1 NAUGHTY FITNESS ⭐ ON OF)2821.716,054,950$25.0010,405
Jessica Nigri2786.036,688,837Free3,566
💋Marleny12625.725,944,228$29.99895
Mrs. Poindexter2473.426,222,759$14.9928,637
Misscarriejune2317.552,984,651Free11,992
𝐿𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑒 𝑀𝒶𝓎 💋 Average Mom Next door 🚪2236.666,009,568$11.9913,921
Big Titty Goth Egg 😈 AKA Lee2037.214,689,356$9.994,782
Dora2029.17460,312Free388
SuicideGirls1901.914,984,620$4.9973,447
Dainty Wilder1831.294,197,034$9.996,762
Cheerleader Kait1818.253,988,954$9.995,438
Tayler hills1814.742,836,162$5.002,863
Brynn Woods1762.043,791,641Free6,017
Giuliana1651.944,068,469Free4,486
Paige VanZant1643.992,332,566$29.992,370
ZartPrickelnd1606.023,642,211$9.992,340
Alyssa 💞✨1554.603,443,209Free1,156
ginasavagex1551.113,134,563$20.00229
Corinna Kopf1463.172,757,858$19.99324
Taylor’s diary1439.443,523,518Free3,487

Normalized likes per day, which is what stops this being a list of the oldest accounts.

Top 25 largest content libraries

CreatorMedia itemsPhotosVideosNormalized likes/day
The_Elegant_Assistant146,217141,5634,65416.21
Rubi Rose145,17151,43493,737654.95
Curvy m*lf ❤99,49898,85564361.57
SuicideGirls73,44770,1273,3201901.91
GillEllisYoung VIP72,68869,9042,784500.43
Diana67,71359,5798,134172.81
VIDEOCALL NOW ?😈😳63,68539,07724,608167.71
Vanilla Faith バニラ・フェイス61,27652,5168,76023.90
🟢BIG BOOTY🟢60,07022,08937,981120.74
💕🧡 Lilly Loves You! 🧡💕55,85229,15526,697506.04
UKCuteGirl💎 CUSTOM CONTENT54,66341,48013,183112.77
Barbie🫦53,24532,98420,261431.38
Sar ☘️ Irish accent 🥵 DM “GIFT” NOW!🎁💦52,60437,56915,035974.90
Slinky Drinks50,36148,9101,451156.46
Sophia Smith Mum Next Door50,14049,746394221.78
Fun, Fit, Naughty Mom48,57940,4728,10766.53
Ms. Scarlet's Sexy Soles/Scarlet Max Cos46,67346,3383355.28
Stormy Succubus44,89637,3197,577161.28
Ariel Anderssen43,44438,9494,49528.17
sheercurvesx142,75033,9918,7596.17
britisholivia 🇬🇧42,11317,72924,384583.02
True Blue HHM42,03741,92211558.81
Cheating gf 😍😍41,87323,41118,462104.59
UCLA soccer player 😍😍41,02227,73513,287345.91
Innocent🤫❤️‍🔥40,91126,26114,650264.20

Top 15 most expensive creators

CreatorPriceNormalized likes/dayMedia
theethroatgod$50.0013.221,158
Trans-May$50.002.43429
Rebecca Ramos$50.003.13915
Lola Sokolova$50.000.84617
Busty Lola VIP$50.0011.341,196
♡ big booty baby ♡$50.0020.72598
Lucky Lee$50.003.49757
Mira nouri$50.0014.45763
Dana Egyptian$50.009.2495
🇳🇴Pure femdom🇳🇴 Kun norsk femdom film🎥$50.004.10488
Somekissa✨NO PPV✨$50.0063.14403
HangryAF Pay and Obey (Femdom, BDSM)$50.0022.49396
Sydney$50.001.733,234
😘 Bisexual Blasian Couples VIP 🥵$50.002.471,234
Bri_bri_$50.000.3880

Top 15 longest bios

CreatorBio charactersNormalized likes/dayPrice
𝓟𝓲𝓬𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓸1,79980.37$4.99
𝓒𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮🌙1,7474.65$15.00
Gattino Piccolinо1,70823.31Free
🅱🅾🅽 🎀 🅱🅾🅽1,699133.12Free
Findom Bully1,67310.23$11.11
𝒮𝒶𝒷𝓇𝒾𝓃𝒶._𝒞𝓀♡1,62634.57$10.00
𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕒 𝕐𝕠𝕟𝕖𝕝𝕒 𝕆𝕗𝕗𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕝 𝕍𝕀ℙ 🥵1,62037.91$15.00
ꪑ​ꪮ​ꪮ​𝘴​ꫝ​ꪑ​ꪖ​ꪶ​ꪶ​ꪮ​᭙​1,5583.50Free
🦋⚡️𝕰𝖑𝖊𝖈𝖙𝖗𝖆⚡️🦋1,54815.70$15.00
Kammie1,53813.50$50.00
• 𝑶𝒏𝒍𝒚 𝑨𝒏𝒂𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒔𝒊𝒂 • 𝑮𝒓𝒊𝒑 𝑹𝒆𝒂𝒑𝒆𝒓 😈1,51360.66$10.99
🍯🧸𝒃𝒍𝒖𝒏𝒕𝒃𝒂𝒃𝒚🧸🍯1,47929.44$8.40
Ashley Marie1,4689.03Free
Emily1,4567.98$7.00
Max1,4369.60$9.99

Measured after stripping HTML markup.

Top 15 longest-dormant creators still listed

CreatorDays since activeTotal likesPrice
Georgia.missy - OLD ACCOUNT1,8712,912$9.99
Skye1,8651,612$10.00
Taylor1,8442,698$4.99
louna__grace1,841413$12.99
u19595081,83464,875$9.99
NEW OF IN BIO1,80127,095$50.00
pinklipz1,7985,420$20.00
Grace1,79217,084$5.99
Taija 🥵🥵🥵1,7621,124$4.99
Katie 🙈(18)1,762856$12.99
TS Desi1,760562$11.00
Caz1,7541,511$15.00
F you, f them, &amp; f that1,7414,488$20.00
Serena Joy😻😻🤤1,741882$6.00
u1356824931,7372,383$20.00

19Fanswiper creator indices

Four more indices, each built only from things a creator controls. That constraint is the point: an index that secretly encodes existing fame tells a creator nothing she can act on.

Content Velocity Score

Posting rate per day of tenure, scaled 0 to 100.

Velocity bandCreatorsShareNormalized likes/day
0–1914,36449.3%3.25
20–396,47022.2%10.25
40–593,21011.0%19.06
60–791,7676.1%27.76
80–1003,30611.4%53.03

Tag Diversity Score

How many distinct things a bio describes, scaled 0 to 100.

Diversity bandCreatorsShareNormalized likes/day
0–199,39532.3%9.70
20–399,01030.9%7.34
40–597,41725.5%7.42
60–792,3158.0%9.23
80–1009803.4%14.17

Posting Consistency Score

Recency of activity, decaying to zero over roughly two months.

Consistency bandCreatorsShareNormalized likes/day
0–194,82216.6%2.22
20–391,5195.2%4.30
40–592,2267.6%4.98
60–796,72323.1%8.52
80–1007,79126.8%19.50

Creator Professionalism Index

Composite of bio depth, verification, social links, library size and tag breadth.

Professionalism bandCreatorsShareNormalized likes/day
0–192200.8%5.49
20–392,7569.5%4.16
40–595,41218.6%5.22
60–7910,88537.4%7.67
80–1009,84433.8%14.06

20Download the data

Every aggregate table on this page is downloadable as CSV, free, with attribution. If you are writing about OnlyFans and want a figure, take the file rather than retyping the number.

DatasetContents
most-searched.csvThe 50 most-Googled creators with search volume and profile stats
pricing.csvEngagement, posting rate and video share by price band
cohorts.csvEvery start-year cohort, 2016 to today
categories.csvContent categories ranked by engagement
services.csvAdvertised services and their engagement lift
countries.csvCreators, pricing and engagement by country
states.csvThe same, by US state
price-points.csvExact advertised prices and how common each is
bio-length.csvBio length bands against engagement
emoji.csvThe most common emoji in OnlyFans bios
completeness.csvProfile Completeness Score bands

21Methodology

Sample

29,239 public creator profiles in the Fanswiper index, of which 29,129 carry both an engagement count and a first-post date. Engagement rates additionally require more than 30 days of tenure, leaving 29,117 creators. Creators began posting between 2016 and 2026.

Definitions

Cleaning

Statistics

Medians throughout. These distributions are heavily right-skewed and a small number of very large accounts move a mean far enough that it describes nobody.

Update frequency

Every figure is computed from the live index when this page is built, so the report updates as the index does rather than being rewritten by hand.

22Limitations

23OnlyFans statistics: frequently asked questions

How many OnlyFans creators are there?

OnlyFans does not publish a creator directory, so no exact public figure exists. This report analyses a sample of 29,129 public creator profiles and does not extrapolate to a platform-wide total. Any article quoting a precise global creator count is relying on company statements rather than independently verifiable data.

What is the average OnlyFans subscription price?

Across 29,117 profiles in this sample the median is $9.99. The single most common price is free, at 30.0% of creators, and the most common paid price is $10.00. Medians are used rather than means because the price distribution is heavily skewed.

Do more expensive OnlyFans creators get more engagement?

No. Engagement peaks in the $10–14.99 band at 9.63 normalized likes per day and falls to 6.35 above $30, which is below what free creators achieve (8.33). The relationship is an inverted U, not a straight line.

How many OnlyFans creators are inactive?

In this sample of 23,081 profiles with an activity timestamp, 29.8% had not been active in 30 days and 14.3% had been silent for 90 days or more. Median time since last activity was 17 days.

What percentage of OnlyFans creators are free?

30.0% of creators in this sample charge nothing to subscribe. Among creators who started in 2026 the figure is 75.8%, against 18.1% for the 2016 cohort.

How much do OnlyFans creators earn?

This report contains no earnings data and makes no earnings claims. Our dataset holds no revenue field, and reliable public data on individual creator earnings does not exist. Any statistic on OnlyFans earnings ultimately traces back to company statements or self-reported surveys, neither of which is independently verifiable.

Does posting more content increase OnlyFans engagement?

Library size shows the strongest association of any variable measured here. Creators with under 100 media items record 2.66 likes per day; those with 5,000 or more record 44.25, a 16.7× difference. This is an association, not proof that posting causes engagement.

Should OnlyFans creators post more video?

The data gives no support for it. Creators whose libraries are under 5% video record 12.45 likes per day; those over 50% video record 5.05. The relationship is negative at every band measured.

Do social media links help OnlyFans creators?

Not measurably, in this sample. Creators publishing at least one external link record 8.35 likes per day (n=12,833) against 8.48 for those with none (n=16,284).

Where are OnlyFans creators located?

Location is self-reported and known for 16,343 creators in this sample (56.1%). The United States is the largest group at 7,439 creators. Engagement varies widely by country, from 11.91 likes per day in MX to 2.28 in DE.

24Key takeaways

25Sources and further reading

Findings in sections 1 to 20 are from our own dataset of 29,129 public creator profiles. They are not sourced from other publishers and are not platform-wide totals.

On platform-wide public statistics, the honest position is that reliable independent data does not exist. OnlyFans publishes no creator directory and no public API. Figures circulating for total creator counts, total payouts and average earnings originate from company announcements or from the annual accounts its parent company, Fenix International Limited, files with UK Companies House. Those accounts are the only audited numbers in the public domain, and they report company financials rather than creator-level statistics. We deliberately do not restate those figures here as though they were ours.

Academic work on creator monetisation and platform labour is indexed on arXiv and Google Scholar. For comparison with an adjacent platform that publishes its own annual research, see Pornhub's Year in Review.

26How to cite this report

FieldValue
TitleOnlyFans Statistics 2026
PublisherFanswiper
Data refreshedAugust 6, 2026
Analytical sample29,129 profiles (29,117 for engagement rates)
Canonical URLhttps://fanswiper.com/onlyfans-statistics
LicenceFree to reproduce with attribution and a link
Datasets11 CSV downloads
MethodologySection 21

Fanswiper (2026). “OnlyFans by the Numbers: a statistical study of 29,129 creator profiles.” Retrieved from https://fanswiper.com/onlyfans-statistics

Journalists and researchers are welcome to reproduce any figure, table or chart with attribution and a link. For underlying aggregates or a cut of the data for a specific study, contact us.

The index behind this report is browsable: by category, by US state, on a map, or through boards.